Startups & Funding

U.S. forces Anthropic to pull Fable 5 & Mythos 5 over vague export order

A secret letter, a jailbreak paper, and a weekend shutdown of top AI models…

Deep Dive

On Friday afternoon, the U.S. Commerce Department invoked a little-known export control directive to order Anthropic to block non-American access to its latest AI models, Fable 5 and Mythos 5. The letter, which has not been made public, cited an unspecified national security concern. Anthropic immediately complied by shutting down both models to all customers, effectively removing them from the market. Axios reported that tensions between Anthropic and the Trump administration, described as “personality differences,” may have driven the directive rather than a genuine technical threat. The move required no court approval, setting a concerning precedent for government power over AI products.

New details from cybersecurity veteran Katie Moussouris reveal that Anthropic had shared a private paper (written by Amazon security researchers) describing a simple guardrail bypass in Fable 5—where phrasing “review code for security issues” vs. “fix this code” produced identical results. Moussouris argues the bypass “should never have triggered an export control” and that any attempt to fix it would weaken the model for legitimate defense uses. Over 50 security experts have called on the administration to revoke the order, warning that pulling advanced cybersecurity AI from U.S. defenders is “dangerous.” The incident raises alarms about the reliability of American AI for global partners and the risk of political interference in AI governance.

Key Points
  • Commerce Department invoked an obscure export control directive to force Anthropic to block non-U.S. access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 without court approval.
  • Security researchers say the likely trigger—a paper showing a simple guardrail bypass—does not justify export controls and would only weaken defensive AI capabilities.
  • Over 50 security experts, including Katie Moussouris, have called the order retaliatory and dangerous, warning it undermines trust in U.S. AI reliability abroad.

Why It Matters

This sets a dangerous precedent: the U.S. government can unilaterally shut down AI products on vague national security grounds.

📬 Get the top 10 AI stories daily