Planet-Centered AI (PCAI) proposed to replace human-centric paradigms
Researcher Maria Perez-Ortiz argues current AI frameworks fuel global instability at ICML 2026.
Maria Perez-Ortiz's latest paper, accepted at ICML 2026, makes a bold case for abandoning purely human-centric AI design. The author argues that contemporary AI paradigms — narrowly focused on individual user preferences, corporate objectives, or even general alignment with human values — are structurally inadequate for addressing global challenges like climate change, biodiversity loss, and geopolitical instability. Drawing on systems thinking, Perez-Ortiz proposes Planet-Centered AI (PCAI) as a research agenda that treats Earth as an interconnected whole where humans are one component. The paper diagnoses recurring limitations in existing frameworks: they ignore feedback loops across sectors, assume stable environments (non-stationarity), and fail to account for deep uncertainty — all of which become catastrophic under current planetary conditions.
PCAI fundamentally reshapes the AI lifecycle. It demands problem formulation that aligns with global sustainability goals, model design that incorporates system-level interactions, evaluation metrics oriented toward long-term trajectories rather than short-term accuracy, and deployment models that enable continuous monitoring of planetary impacts. The author advances a falsifiable claim: AI systems optimized without explicit consideration of systemic consequences are more likely to exacerbate instability than mitigate it. This paper serves as both a critique and a call to action, offering concrete directions for researchers and practitioners to build AI that serves not just human interests but the health of the entire planet.
- Proposes Planet-Centered AI (PCAI) that treats Earth as an interconnected whole, moving beyond human-centric design.
- Diagnoses three critical blind spots in current AI: systemic risk, non-stationarity, and deep uncertainty.
- Makes a falsifiable claim: ignoring systemic consequences makes AI more likely to worsen global instability than help.
Why It Matters
Could fundamentally redefine how AI is designed, shifting priority from user satisfaction to planetary resilience.