Researchers build AI to detect citation cartels in scholarly networks
A new method flags paper communities with 254x abnormal citation density.
A trust-aware pipeline combines citation graph structure with semantic citation intent to rank suspicious paper-level communities for audit. Researchers used an LLM teacher to label 205,897 citation pairs, trained a SciBERT student, and scaled citation-intent typing to 2.04 million unique graph edges. The Composite Cartel Index (CCI), which integrates multiple metrics, identified a top community of 1,079 papers with 254.3 times more internal citations than expected—64.2% of them superficial. Comparisons against several baselines showed CCI cannot be reduced to a single heuristic, and edge excision validation confirmed its selected communities behave distinctly from random removals.
- LLM teacher labeled 205,897 citation pairs; SciBERT scaled intent typing to 2.04M edges.
- Composite Cartel Index (CCI) combines 6 metrics including internal density, semantic superficiality, and PageRank shift.
- Top detected cartel: 1,079 papers with 254.3x expected internal citations, 64.2% superficial.
Why It Matters
Automates the detection of citation cartels, helping journals and funders preserve integrity in scholarly metrics.