Research & Papers

The TEA Nets framework combines AI and cognitive network science to model targets, events and actors in text

Open-source Python tool reveals how conspiracy texts and therapy transcripts differ at the network level.

Deep Dive

The TEA Nets (Target-Event-Agent Networks) framework, introduced by Sebastiano Franchini and colleagues from the University of Trento and other institutions, provides a computational approach to extract subjects (Agents), verbs (Events), and objects (Targets) from natural language texts. Built as an open-source Python library, it sits at the intersection of artificial intelligence and cognitive network science. The researchers tested TEA Nets on three distinct case studies to demonstrate its versatility.

In the LOCO conspiracy corpus, TEA Nets analyzed 4,227 texts. High-conspiracy narratives connected personal pronouns ("I", "you", "we") with the same actions twice as frequently as low-similarity conspiracy narratives. They also linked person-focused elements ("you", "people") to actions eliciting anger significantly above the random baseline (z=2.63, p<.05). In contrast, low-similarity conspiracy narratives emphasized scientific actors ("researcher", "scientist"). For the HOPE and CounseLLMe datasets, which include 212 human and 200 LLM-based psychotherapy transcripts respectively, TEA Nets revealed emotional nuances. When expressing feelings, Claude 3 Haiku, GPT-3.5, and humans all used sad words more frequently than random expectations, but Haiku expressed sadness with lower emotional intensity than humans (U=1243.5, p=.036). These findings have implications for LLM-simulated patient training in psychotherapy.

Key Points
  • TEA Nets is an open-source Python library that extracts subject-verb-object triples (Agents, Events, Targets) from text using cognitive network science and AI.
  • In LOCO corpus, high-conspiracy texts linked personal pronouns to actions twice as often as low-similarity texts, with anger associations above baseline (z=2.63).
  • On 412 therapy transcripts, Claude 3 Haiku showed lower emotional intensity for sadness than humans (U=1243.5, p=.036), highlighting AI vs. human emotional expression gaps.

Why It Matters

TEA Nets offers interpretable text analysis for researchers studying conspiracy, emotion, and LLM behavior, bridging cognitive science and NLP.