Some Musk v. Altman Jurors Don't Like Elon Musk
Some jurors admitted bias against Musk, but assured fairness in OpenAI case.
The trial of Musk v. Altman commenced Monday in Oakland, California, with jury selection highlighting a unique challenge: some potential jurors openly disliked Elon Musk. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers noted that many Americans hold negative views of Musk but can still serve fairly. Only one juror was excused due to strong bias. The nine selected jurors include a painter, a former Lockheed Martin employee, and a psychiatrist, all of whom pledged impartiality regarding Musk and AI.
Outside the courtroom, drama unfolded as OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and president Greg Brockman were seen in the security line, while Musk was absent. He promoted a critical New Yorker piece on Altman via X, and OpenAI countered by calling the lawsuit an attempt to undermine its mission. Protesters outside called for a pause on AI development. Opening statements and the first witness are scheduled for Tuesday, with the jury's verdict being advisory only.
- Jury selection revealed that several jurors had negative opinions about Elon Musk, but only one was excused for bias.
- The nine jurors include a painter, a former Lockheed Martin employee, and a psychiatrist.
- Musk promoted a critical article about Altman on X, while OpenAI accused him of undermining their mission.
Why It Matters
This trial could influence how AI nonprofits are governed and set legal precedents for mission drift.