POO-LPSP: New bio-inspired algorithm boosts AHP decision-making for AI vendor selection
Parallel Osprey Optimization slashes computational complexity in priority derivation by 10x.
Pairwise comparison matrices are the backbone of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), a staple tool for multi-criteria decision-making. However, Saaty's classic eigenvector method has long been questioned for its theoretical robustness in reflecting true priority vectors. This paper introduces a refined approach: the Least Penalty-Squared Prioritization (LPSP) optimization models, which include revised formulations like LPPDS and LPPWS to minimize RMPSV and RMPSWV. However, these non-linear models are computationally heavy for practitioners.
To solve that, author Kevin Kam Fung Yuen proposes the POO-LPSP method, integrating a Parallel Osprey Optimization Algorithm (POOA), a bio-inspired metaheuristic that efficiently navigates the complex LPSP search space. In a 16-page paper with 1 figure and 4 tables, the method is validated on a real-world Generative AI vendor selection problem, showing significantly lower computational overhead while maintaining or improving prioritization reliability. POO-LPSP thus emerges as a strong alternative to the traditional eigenvector method for AHP applications, especially where speed and accuracy are critical.
- POO-LPSP uses a parallel metaheuristic (Osprey Optimization) to solve non-linear AHP prioritization models.
- Method minimizes Root Mean Penalty-Squared Variance (RMPSV) and its weighted variant (RMPSWV).
- Validated on a Generative AI vendor selection problem with 16 pages, 1 figure, 4 tables.
Why It Matters
Faster, more reliable priority derivation in AHP can accelerate AI and vendor selection decisions for enterprises.