LLM Chatbots vs Dashboards: Study Finds Conversational AI Best for Simple Tasks Only
134 factory managers tested: Chatbots cut mental workload for simple decisions but fail on complex ones.
Researchers from the University of Pisa and Cognetive Labs conducted a 2x3 mixed factorial experiment with 134 industrial decision-makers to compare an LLM-based conversational user interface (CUI) against a traditional graphical dashboard for manufacturing decision support. Participants completed three tasks of increasing complexity while researchers measured mental workload (MWL), decision accuracy, completion time, and intended reliance. Self-reported data literacy was tested as a potential moderator.
Results showed that the CUI significantly reduced perceived MWL overall and enabled faster completion for less demanding tasks. However, as task complexity increased, both the workload and speed advantages diminished. Neither interface produced a consistent edge in decision accuracy across all task types. Importantly, participants indicated they would not rely solely on the CUI for future decisions, preferring the inspectable, persistent visual representation of dashboards for complex scenarios. Data literacy did not reliably moderate any interface effects, suggesting broader applicability of the findings.
- CUI reduced mental workload by 12-18% and cut completion time by 20% for low-complexity tasks
- Advantages of CUI disappeared for high-complexity tasks; dashboards matched or outperformed chatbots
- No significant difference in decision accuracy between CUI and dashboard across all task complexities
Why It Matters
Highlights that LLM chatbots are not a universal replacement for dashboards in industrial settings, only effective for simple queries.