Is it possible for wan2.5 to be open-sourced in the future? It is already far behind Sor2 and veo3.1, not to mention the newly released stronger Seed 2.0 and the latest model of Keling
A closed-source, outdated model is sparking a major open-source debate.
Deep Dive
The AI community is debating whether the closed-source Wan2.5 video/audio generation model should be open-sourced, as it's now considered outdated and expensive. It lags behind newer, stronger competitors like Sor2, Veo3.1, and the newly released Seed 2.0. Users point to the precedent of Wan2.2 being open-sourced, questioning if releasing Wan2.5's code could democratize advanced multimodal AI or if it's too far behind to matter.
Why It Matters
This debate highlights the growing pressure on closed-source AI to keep up or release their tech to the community.