India escapes worst US forced-labour tariffs, but trade deal still distant
New Delhi's timely policy change saved it from a 12.5% tariff—but tough talks remain.
India narrowly avoided the worst of Washington's latest tariff action after a timely policy change. The Trump administration, under Section 301 of the US Trade Act, targeted 60 economies for failing to curb imports made with forced labour. As late as last month, India faced a 12.5% rate, but a June 14 amendment to its foreign trade policy banning forced-labour imports led US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer to place India in the lower 10% tariff band—alongside Canada, Britain, Bangladesh, and Pakistan. Trade experts note that the factual basis for the tariff on India is questionable, but the reprieve is only a partial win.
Despite the lower tariff, analysts warn that significant work remains to secure a long-sought US-India trade deal. US demands on market access, intellectual property, and non-tariff barriers persist, while friction over India's continued purchases of Russian oil complicates negotiations. The tariffs replaced temporary global levies struck down by the Supreme Court in February, which had upended the previous 'Liberation Day' regime. With both sides still far apart, the 10% tariff may be a temporary cushion, not a final resolution.
- India amended its foreign trade policy on June 14 to ban imports made with forced labour, avoiding a 12.5% tariff and getting a 10% levy instead.
- The US imposed Section 301 tariffs on 60 economies; India was among 17 nations (including Canada, UK, Bangladesh) hit with the lower 10% rate.
- Broader trade deal talks remain stalled due to US demands on market access and friction over India's Russian oil purchases.
Why It Matters
India's tariff reprieve is temporary; unresolved trade and geopolitical issues threaten long-term US-India economic relations.