Forgetting helps AI agents agree on shared meanings faster
Adaptive agents converge faster, but non-adaptive ones think they already agree
A new paper from Landon Liu, Mary Kelly, and Alan Tsang, accepted at CogSci 2026, explores how forgetting shapes shared meaning in groups of agents. Using a non-partnership coordination game—a departure from traditional games where players share payoffs—the researchers simulated conversations between agents with different memory characteristics: some were adaptive (forgetful, discounting old information) and others were non-adaptive (rigid, retaining all information equally).
Key findings: Adaptive agents achieved actual conceptual convergence faster and ended with closer semantic regions. But non-adaptive agents perceived convergence earlier—a false sense of agreement. Additionally, gradually reducing the weight of new information over time produced more stable agreements than keeping a constant weight. The study underscores that memory traits like forgetting and adaptiveness are critical for the emergence of shared meaning, with implications for multiagent AI systems, collaborative bots, and human-machine communication.
- Adaptive agents (with memory degradation) converged on shared meanings faster than non-adaptive agents.
- Non-adaptive agents falsely perceived earlier convergence despite having less actual alignment.
- Gradual discounting of novel information led to more stable conceptual agreements than fixed weighting.
Why It Matters
Designing AI agents that forget strategically could improve group understanding and prevent false consensus.