Enterprise & Industry

Can the US Democrats beat Trump by becoming more like him? A Chinese academic weighs in

Fighting fire with fire may win elections but erode democratic identity.

Deep Dive

Since losing the presidency and Senate control in 2024, the US Democratic Party has adopted a controversial strategy of 'selective Trumpification,' according to Chinese political scientist Gao Hailong. Writing in the CASS-sponsored *Contemporary American Review*, Gao argues that Democrats are increasingly mimicking President Trump’s abrasive style and populist economic nationalism while attempting to retain core liberal values. This marks a significant shift from their post-2016 response, which Gao describes as merely 'surface-level policy corrections.' The current approach includes strongman-style governance tactics and a focus on working-class economic messaging, effectively borrowing from the Republican playbook to regain voter traction.

However, Gao warns this strategy is a double-edged sword. While it may help Democrats win back key swing voters in the short term, it risks eroding the party’s long-standing identity as guardians of American democratic institutions. The adoption of Trump-like rhetoric could alienate moderate and institutionalist factions within the party, potentially leading to internal fractures. The analysis suggests that fighting fire with fire may deliver electoral wins but could eventually damage the party’s brand beyond repair, leaving Democrats without a clear ideological foundation. The piece is notable as a Chinese academic’s observation of US political dynamics, reflecting Beijing’s interest in understanding American electoral polarization.

Key Points
  • Gao Hailong (CASS) says Democrats have adopted 'selective Trumpification' since the 2024 election loss.
  • Strategy includes borrowing Trump's abrasive style and economic nationalism to win back voters.
  • Risks undermining the party's brand as defenders of democratic institutions, per *Contemporary American Review*.

Why It Matters

Chinese academic analysis highlights how electoral desperation can push parties to compromise their core identity.